It was clear we could not finish the week without a rumor about Apple. And this time is raise the dead: the iPhone nano. Well, never really existed, but at least his ghost will rise. As discussed very well Buzzmóvil Kote in Tech News, Bloomberg has been released to the pool for this year saying that we could have a new family member of Apple's iPhone.
Would that perhaps the release expected for summer-autumn of this year instead of a new iPad as we have been discussing so far? Logic tells us that Apple should not be thinking about lowering the features of your iPhone 4 today because they are selling this terminal directly to everyone who wants one.
While it is true that with Android, its main competitor, is a broad range of equipment to choose from superphone very basic models, the iPhone never seems to have needed a more affordable and discreet to sell units. But Android spans all kinds of phones and this must be taken into account.
With Google's operating system to grow brutal pace, pick up users from the lower ranges seems silly if not end, as with the photograph, one is loyal to a platform. So far the unit models and non-disintegration has been a feature of your Apple and it works very well. Of course, I do not think that is a problem for the company to "sell the need for more affordable phone to reach everyone who wants to have an iPhone." And frankly, a cheap iPhone would not be a bad idea in the face of competing in the input range.
Returning to the rumor uncovered, the supposedly new cheaper iPhone would not market the latest components and reduce the quality of the screen to make it feasible for about $ 200, a price up too tight. In addition, the system premiered universal SIM card that actually mean that there would be no room for that component so that its use was more universal and simpler, in theory, change the user operator.
It would be logical to think if Apple wanted a phone that consumers can buy without problems and is not tied to a contract with an operator. This feature itself that seems to be implemented even this year, so we have to wait. 
Would that perhaps the release expected for summer-autumn of this year instead of a new iPad as we have been discussing so far? Logic tells us that Apple should not be thinking about lowering the features of your iPhone 4 today because they are selling this terminal directly to everyone who wants one.
While it is true that with Android, its main competitor, is a broad range of equipment to choose from superphone very basic models, the iPhone never seems to have needed a more affordable and discreet to sell units. But Android spans all kinds of phones and this must be taken into account.
With Google's operating system to grow brutal pace, pick up users from the lower ranges seems silly if not end, as with the photograph, one is loyal to a platform. So far the unit models and non-disintegration has been a feature of your Apple and it works very well. Of course, I do not think that is a problem for the company to "sell the need for more affordable phone to reach everyone who wants to have an iPhone." And frankly, a cheap iPhone would not be a bad idea in the face of competing in the input range.
Returning to the rumor uncovered, the supposedly new cheaper iPhone would not market the latest components and reduce the quality of the screen to make it feasible for about $ 200, a price up too tight. In addition, the system premiered universal SIM card that actually mean that there would be no room for that component so that its use was more universal and simpler, in theory, change the user operator.
It would be logical to think if Apple wanted a phone that consumers can buy without problems and is not tied to a contract with an operator. This feature itself that seems to be implemented even this year, so we have to wait.
No comments:
Post a Comment